jonathannausner

jonathan nausner

in no particular order: ideas, creativity, inspiration, storytelling, strategy, planning, the blurry borders of analogue and digital, berlin, advertising and whatever will be next. about | books | links | archive
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Xing Slideshare Flickr Instagram Pinterest Tumblr

Powered by Genesis

Recent Reading: Superfreakonomics

September 20, 2010 by Jonathan

Train rides really help advancing in your reading list. This time I was accompanied by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner’s follow-up to their bestseller Freakonomics: Superfreakonomics.

The book contains a couple of gems of information that will always come handy at parties, like the fact that after sex changes men (who originally used to be women) will earn more than before, while their newly female counterparts will see their salaries drop.

The main theme of Superfreakonomics is the power and importance of incentives. The question why people do things or how they could be motivated to do things is the red thread along which Levitt and Dubner shed light at subjects like prostitution, altruism, global warming, terrorism and simple solutions. For instance, the best motivation for hospital staff and doctors to wash their hands is to have them culture their hands‘ surfaces in petri dishes and display the colorful results on all screen savers in the clinic. In that aspect Superfreakonomics is stuffed full with the interesting.

When Dubner (I believe that’s his shtick) drifts off to see whether the infamous Kitty Genovese incident might have been inaccurately reported or covers many different viewpoints and ideas on global warming, plus some science fiction sounding solutions, I was not too excited.

The freakonomicists are most interesting when they let data and science reveal the unexpected: how for instance TV did more to empower women in India than all prior government interventions. The short last chapter is a highlight: it describes Keith Chen’s experiment in which capuchin monkeys were taught the concept of money (exchanging coins for food). It resulted in the monkeys behaving like stock-market investors at the prospect of loss, but also in theft, greed and …wait for it… prostitution. The experiment was halted because it was feared that it would damage the monkey’s social structure.

In summary, Superfreakonomics is a good, entertaining and insightful read, though not as great as the first book. I still read it in one go.

Share this post:

Filed Under: Numbers, People, Reading

You get the answers you ask for.

Juli 27, 2010 by Jonathan

Yesterday, I learned that Henri Ford’s classic „If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.“-soundbite is usually quoted when people prepare to lash out at market research.

Funny, I always understood it as a criticism of stupid questions.
You always get the answers you ask for. Or deserve.

That is all.

Share this post:

Filed Under: Account Planning, Numbers

What if Economists were in charge?

März 30, 2010 by Jonathan

I am a big fan of Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner’s Freakonomics, both book and blog, and their refreshing perspective on „the hidden side of everything“. Only recently they have launched Freakonomics Radio, a regular podcast which I recommend to everyone who is observing people and numbers.

I just got around to listen to the last episode What Would the World Look Like if Economists Were in Charge? This speculative question opens another truly entertaining and informative podcast episode. I had to laugh out loud at Mart Laar’s description of his encounter with Margaret Thatcher. I found Stephen Levitt’s anecdote of his daughter at the end especially insightful, as it explains why negotiators (like lawyers) and not number people run the show in politics.

Superfreakonomics is already on my bookshelf, but given my current workload this will have to wait until July i am afraid.

Share this post:

Filed Under: Input, Numbers, People Tagged With: economics, freakonomics, podcast, statistics, tip